Henri Poincaré

Henri Poincaré books and biography

Henri Poincar

 Henri Poincaré, photograph from the frontispiece of the 1913 edition of
Henri Poincar, photograph from the frontispiece of the 1913 edition of "Last Thoughts"
Born April 29, 1854
Nancy, France
Died July 17, 1912
Paris, France
Residence France
Nationality French
Field Mathematician and physicist
Institution Corps des Mines
Caen University
La Sorbonne
Bureau des Longitudes
Alma Mater Lyce Nancy
cole Polytechnique
cole des Mines
Academic Advisor Charles Hermite
Notable Students Louis Bachelier
Known for Poincar conjecture
Three-body problem
Special relativity
Notable Prizes Matteucci Medal (1905)

Jules Henri Poincar (April 29, 1854 – July 17, 1912) (IPA: [pwɛ̃kaˈʀe][1]) was one of France's greatest mathematicians and theoretical physicists, and a philosopher of science. Poincar is often described as a polymath, and in mathematics as 'The Last Universalist', since he excelled in all fields of the discipline as it existed during his lifetime.

As a mathematician and physicist, he made many original fundamental contributions to pure and applied mathematics, mathematical physics, and celestial mechanics. He was responsible for formulating the Poincar conjecture, one of the most famous problems in mathematics. In his research on the three-body problem, Poincar became the first person to discover a chaotic deterministic system which laid the foundations of modern chaos theory. He is considered to be one of the founders of the field of topology.

Poincar introduced the modern principle of relativity and was the first to present the Lorentz transformations in their modern symmetrical form. Poincar discovered the remaining relativistic velocity transformations and recorded them in a letter to Lorentz in 1905. Thus he obtained perfect invariance of all of Maxwell's equations, the final step in the formulation of the theory of special relativity.

The Poincar group used in physics and mathematics was named after him.



Poincar was born on April 29, 1854 in Cit Ducale neighborhood, Nancy, France into an influential family (Belliver, 1956). His father Leon Poincar (1828-1892) was a professor of medicine at the University of Nancy (Sagaret, 1911). His adored younger sister Aline married the spiritual philosopher Emile Boutroux. Another notable member of Jules' family was his cousin Raymond Poincar, who would become the President of France, 1913 to 1920, and a fellow member of the Acadmie franaise.[2]


During his childhood he was seriously ill for a time with diphtheria and received special instruction from his gifted mother, Eugnie Launois (1830-1897).

In 1862 Henri entered the Lyce in Nancy (now renamed the Lyce Henri Poincar in his honour, along with the University of Nancy). He spent eleven years at the Lyce and during this time he proved to be one of the top students in every topic he studied. He excelled in written composition. His mathematics teacher described him as a "monster of mathematics" and he won first prizes in the concours gnral, a competition between the top pupils from all the Lyces across France. (His poorest subjects were music and physical education, where he was described as "average at best" (O'Connor et al., 2002). However, poor eyesight and a tendency towards absentmindedness may explain these difficulties (Carl, 1968). He graduated from the Lyce in 1871 with a Bachelor's degree in letters and sciences.

During the Franco-Prussian War of 1870 he served alongside his father in the Ambulance Corps.

Poincar entered the cole Polytechnique in 1873. There he studied mathematics as a student of Charles Hermite, continuing to excel and publishing his first paper (Dmonstration nouvelle des proprits de l'indicatrice d'une surface) in 1874. He graduated in 1875 or 1876. He went on to study at the cole des Mines, continuing to study mathematics in addition to the mining engineering syllabus and received the degree of ordinary engineer in March 1879.

As a graduate of the cole des Mines he joined the Corps des Mines as an inspector for the Vesoul region in northeast France. He was on the scene of a mining disaster at Magny in August 1879 in which 18 miners died. He carried out the official investigation into the accident in a characteristically thorough and humane way.

At the same time, Poincar was preparing for his doctorate in sciences in mathematics under the supervision of Charles Hermite. His doctoral thesis was in the field of differential equations. Poincar devised a new way of studying the properties of these functions. He not only faced the question of determining the integral of such equations, but also was the first person to study their general geometric properties. He realised that they could be used to model the behaviour of multiple bodies in free motion within the solar system. Poincar graduated from the University of Paris in 1879.

The young Henri Poincaré
The young Henri Poincar


Soon after, he was offered a post as junior lecturer in mathematics at Caen University, but he never fully abandoned his mining career to mathematics. He worked at the Ministry of Public Services as an engineer in charge of northern railway development from 1881 to 1885. He eventually became chief engineer of the Corps de Mines in 1893 and inspector general in 1910.

Beginning in 1881 and for the rest of his career, he taught at the University of Paris, (the Sorbonne). He was initially appointed as the matre de confrences d'analyse (associate professor of analysis) (Sageret, 1911). Eventually, he held the chairs of Physical and Experimental Mechanics, Mathematical Physics and Theory of Probability, and Celestial Mechanics and Astronomy.

Also in that same year, Poincar married Miss Poulain d'Andecy. Together they had four children: Jeanne (born 1887), Yvonne (born 1889), Henriette (born 1891), and Lon (born 1893).

In 1887, at the young age of 32, Poincar was elected to the French Academy of Sciences. He became its president in 1906, and was elected to the Acadmie franaise in 1909.

In 1887 he won Oscar II, King of Sweden's mathematical competition for a resolution of the three-body problem concerning the free motion of multiple orbiting bodies. (See #The three-body problem section below)

In 1893 Poincar joined the French Bureau des Longitudes, which engaged him in the synchronization of time around the world. In 1897 Poincar backed an unsuccessful proposal for the decimalization of circular measure, and hence time and longitude. (see Galison 2003) It was this post which led him to consider the question of establishing international time zones and the synchronization of time between bodies in relative motion. (See #Work on Relativity section below)

In 1899, and again more successfully in 1904, he intervened in the trials of Alfred Dreyfus. He attacked the spurious scientific claims of some of the evidence brought against Dreyfus, who was a Jewish officer in the French army charged with treason by anti-Semitic colleagues.

In 1912 Poincar underwent surgery for a prostate problem and subsequently died from an embolism on July 17, 1912, in Paris. He was aged 58. He is buried in the Poincar family vault in the Cemetery of Montparnasse, Paris.

The French Minister of Education, Claude Allegre, has recently (2004) proposed that Poincar be reburied in the Pantheon in Paris, which is reserved for French citizens only of the highest honor. [2]


Poincar made many contributions to different fields of applied mathematics such as: celestial mechanics, fluid mechanics, optics, electricity, telegraphy, capillarity, elasticity, thermodynamics, potential theory, quantum theory, theory of relativity and physical cosmology.

He was also a popularizer of mathematics and physics and wrote several books for the lay public.

Among the specific topics he contributed to are the following:

  • algebraic topology
  • the theory of analytic functions of several complex variables
  • the theory of abelian functions
  • algebraic geometry
  • Poincar was responsible for formulating one of the most famous problems in mathematics. Known as the Poincar conjecture, it is a problem in topology.
  • Poincar recurrence theorem
  • Hyperbolic geometry
  • number theory
  • the three-body problem
  • the theory of diophantine equations
  • the theory of electromagnetism
  • the special theory of relativity
  • In an 1894 paper, he introduced the concept of the fundamental group.
  • In the field of differential equations Poincar has given many results that are critical for the qualitative theory of differential equations, for example the Poincar sphere and the Poincar map.
  • Poincar on "everybody's belief" in the Normal Law of Errors (see normal distribution for an account of that "law")

The three-body problem

The problem of finding the general solution to the motion of more than two orbiting bodies in the solar system had eluded mathematicians since Newton's time. This was known originally as the three-body problem and later the n-body problem, where n is any number of more than two orbiting bodies. The n-body solution was considered very important and challenging at the close of the nineteenth century. Indeed in 1887, in honor of his 60th birthday, Oscar II, King of Sweden, advised by Gsta Mittag-Leffler, established a prize for anyone who could find the solution to the problem. The announcement was quite specific:

Given a system of arbitrarily many mass points that attract each according to Newton's law, under the assumption that no two points ever collide, try to find a representation of the coordinates of each point as a series in a variable that is some known function of time and for all of whose values the series converges uniformly.

In case the problem could not be solved, any other important contribution to classical mechanics would then considered to be prizeworthy. The prize was finally awarded to Poincar, even though he did not solve the original problem. One of the judges, the distinguished Karl Weierstrass, said, "This work cannot indeed be considered as furnishing the complete solution of the question proposed, but that it is nevertheless of such importance that its publication will inaugurate a new era in the history of celestial mechanics." (The first version of his contribution even contained a serious error; for details see the article by Diacu). The version finally printed contained many important ideas which lead to the theory of chaos. The problem as stated originally was finally solved by Karl Sundman for n=3 in 1912 and was generalised to the case of n>3 bodies by Q. Wang in the 1990s.

Work on relativity

Poincar's work at the Bureau des Longitudes on establishing international time zones, led him to consider how clocks at rest on the Earth, which would be moving at different speeds relative to absolute space (or the "luminiferous aether"), could be synchronized. At the same time Dutch theorist Hendrik Lorentz was developing Maxwell's theory into a theory of the motion of charged particles ("electrons" or "ions"), and their interaction with radiation. He had introduced the concept of local time

t^prime = t-vx^prime/c^2,; mathrm{where}; x^prime = x - vt

and was using it to explain the failure of optical and electrical experiments to detect motion relative to the aether (see Michelson-Morley experiment). Poincar (1900) discussed Lorentz's "wonderful invention" of local time and remarked that it arose when moving clocks are synchronized by exchanging light signals assumed to travel with the same speed in both directions in a moving frame[3]. In "The Measure of Time" (Poincar 1898), he discussed the difficulty of establishing simultaneity at a distance and concluded it can be established by convention. He also discussed the "postulate of the speed of light", and formulated the principle of relativity, according to which no mechanical or electromagnetic experiment can discriminate between a state of uniform motion and a state of rest.

Thereafter, Poincar was a constant interpreter (and sometimes friendly critic) of Lorentz's theory. Poincar as a philosopher, was interested in the "deeper meaning". Thus he interpreted Lorentz's theory in terms of the principle of relativity and in so doing he came up with many insights that are now associated with special relativity.

Marie Curie and Poincaré talk at the 1911 Solvay Conference.
Marie Curie and Poincar talk at the 1911 Solvay Conference.

In the paper of 1900 Poincar discussed the recoil of a physical object when it emits a burst of radiation in one direction, as predicted by Maxwell-Lorentz electrodynamics. He remarked that the stream of radiation appeared to act like a "fictitious fluid" with a mass per unit volume of e/c2, where e is the energy density; in other words, the equivalent mass of the radiation is m = E / c2. Poincar considered the recoil of the emitter to be an unresolved feature of Maxwell-Lorentz theory, which he discussed again in "Science and Hypothesis" (1902) and "The Value of Science" (1904). In the latter he said the recoil "is contrary to the principle of Newton since our projectile here has no mass, it is not matter, it is energy", and discussed two other unexplained effects: (1) non-conservation of mass implied by Lorentz's variable mass γm, Abraham's theory of variable mass and Kaufmann's experiments on the mass of fast moving electrons and (2) the non-conservation of energy in the radium experiments of Madame Curie. It was Einstein's insight that a body losing energy as radiation or heat was losing mass of amount m = E / c2, and the corresponding mass-energy conservation law, E=mc, which resolved these problems1.

In 1905 Poincar wrote to Lorentz [4] about Lorentz's paper of 1904, which Poincar described as a "paper of supreme importance." In this letter he pointed out an error Lorentz had made when he had applied his transformation to one of Maxwell's equations, that for charge-occupied space, and also questioned the time dilation factor given by Lorentz. In a second letter to Lorentz[5], Poincar explained the group property of the transformations, which Lorentz had not noticed, and gave his own reason why Lorentz's time dilation factor was indeed correct: Lorentz’s factor was necessary to make the Lorentz transformation form a group. In the letter, he also gave Lorentz what is now known as the relativistic velocity-addition law, which is necessary to demonstrate invariance. Poincar later delivered a paper at the meeting of the Academy of Sciences in Paris on 5 June 1905 in which these issues were addressed. In the published version of that short paper he wrote

The essential point, established by Lorentz, is that the equations of the electromagnetic field are not altered by a certain transformation (which I will call by the name of Lorentz) of the form2:
x^prime = kellleft(x + varepsilon tright),~t^prime = kellleft(t + varepsilon xright),~y^prime = ell y,~ z^prime = ell z,~k = 1/sqrt{1-varepsilon^2}.

He then wrote that in order for the Lorentz transformations to form a group and satisfy the principle of relativity, the arbitrary function ellleft(varepsilonright) must be unity for all varepsilon (Lorentz had set ell = 1 by a different argument). Poincar's discovery of the velocity transformations, allowed him to obtain perfect invariance, the final step in the discovery of the Theory of Special Relativity.

In an enlarged version of the paper that did not appear until 1906, he published his group property proof, incorporating the velocity addition law that he had previously written to Lorentz. The paper contains many other deductions from, and applications of, the transformations. For example, Poincar (1906) pointed out that the combination x2 + y2 + z2c2t2 is invariant, and he introduced the 4-vector notation for which Hermann Minkowski became known.

Einstein's first paper on relativity derived the Lorentz transformation and presented them in the same form as had Poincar. It was published three months after Poincar's short paper, but before Poincar's longer version appeared. Although Einstein (1905) relied on the principle of relativity and used the same clock synchronization procedure that Poincar (1900) had described, his paper was remarkable in that it had no references at all.

Poincar never acknowledged Einstein's work on Special Relativity, but Einstein acknowledged Poincar's in the text of a lecture in 1921 called Geometrie und Erfahrung. Later Einstein commented on Poincar as being one of the pioneers of relativity:

Lorentz had already recognized that the transformation named after him is essential for the analysis of Maxwell's equations, and Poincar deepened this insight still further ...

Poincar's work in the development of Special Relativity is well recognized (e.g. Darrigol 2004), though most historians stress that despite many similarities with Einstein's work, the two had very different research agendas and interpretations of the work (see Galison 2003 and Kragh 1999). A minority go much further, such as the historian of science Sir Edmund Whittaker, who held that Poincar and Lorentz were the true discoverers of Relativity (Whittaker 1953). Poincar consistently credited Lorentz's achievements, ranking his own contributions as minor. Thus, he wrote: "Lorentz has tried to modify his hypothesis so as to make it in accord with the hypothesis of complete impossibility of measuring absolute motion. He has succeeded in doing so in his article [Lorentz 1904]. The importance of the problem has made me take up the question again; the results that I have obtained agreement on all important points with those of Lorentz; I have been led only to modify or complete them on some points of detail. The essential point, established by Lorentz, is that the equations of the electromagnetic field are not altered by a certain transformation" (Poincar 1905) [emphasis added]. In an address in 1909 on "The New Mechanics", Poincar discussed the demolition of Newton's mechanics brought about by Max Abraham and Lorentz, without mentioning Einstein. In one of his last essays entitled "The Quantum Theory" (1913), when referring to the Solvay Conference, Poincar again described special relativity as the "mechanics of Lorentz":

... at every moment [the twenty physicists from different countries] could be heard talking of the new mechanics which they contrasted with the old mechanics. Now what was the old mechanics? Was it that of Newton, the one which still reigned uncontested at the close of the nineteenth century? No, it was the mechanics of Lorentz, the one dealing with the principle of relativity; the one which, hardly five years ago, seemed to be the height of boldness ... the mechanics of Lorentz endures ... no body in motion will ever be able to exceed the speed of light ... the mass of a body is not constant ... no experiment will ever be able [to detect] motion either in relation to absolute space or even in relation to the aether. [emphasis added]

On the other hand, in a memoir written as a tribute to Poincar after his death, Lorentz readily admitted the mistake he had made and credited Poincar's achievements:

For certain of the physical magnitudes which enter in the formulae I have not indicated the transformation which suits best. This has been done by Poincar, and later by Einstein and Minkowski. My formulae were encumbered by certain terms which should have been made to disappear. [...] I have not established the principle of relativity as rigorously and universally true. Poincar, on the other hand, has obtained a perfect invariance of the electro-magnetic equations, and he has formulated 'the postulate of relativity', terms which he was the first to employ. [emphasis added]

In summary, Poincar regarded the mechanics as developed by Lorentz in order to obey the principle of relativity as the essence of the theory, while Lorentz stressed that perfect invariance was first obtained by Poincar. The modern view is inclined to say that the group property and the invariance are the essential points.


Poincar's work habits have been compared to a bee flying from flower to flower. Poincar was interested in the way his mind worked; he studied his habits and gave a talk about his observations in 1908 at the Institute of General Psychology in Paris. He linked his way of thinking to how he made several discoveries.

The mathematician Darboux claimed he was un intuitif (intuitive), arguing that this is demonstrated by the fact that he worked so often by visual representation. He did not care about being rigorous and disliked logic. He believed that logic was not a way to invent but a way to structure ideas and that logic limits ideas.

Toulouse' characterization

Poincar's mental organization was not only interesting to Poincar himself but also to Toulouse, a psychologist of the Psychology Laboratory of the School of Higher Studies in Paris. Toulouse wrote a book entitled Henri Poincar (1910). In it, he discussed Poincar's regular schedule:

  • He worked during the same times each day in short periods of time. He undertook mathematical research for four hours a day, between 10 a.m. and noon then again from 5 p.m. to 7 p.m.. He would read articles in journals later in the evening.
  • He had an exceptional memory and could recall the page and line of any item in a text he had read. He was also able to remember verbatim things heard by ear. He retained these abilities all his life.
  • His normal work habit was to solve a problem completely in his head, then commit the completed problem to paper.
  • He was ambidextrous and nearsighted.
  • His ability to visualise what he heard proved particularly useful when he attended lectures since his eyesight was so poor that he could not see properly what his lecturers were writing on the blackboard.

However, these abilities were somewhat balanced by his shortcomings:

  • He was physically clumsy and artistically inept.
  • He was always in a rush and disliked going back for changes or corrections.
  • He never spent a long time on a problem since he believed that the subconscious would continue working on the problem while he consciously worked on another problem.

In addition, Toulouse stated that most mathematicians worked from principles already established while Poincar was the type that started from basic principle each time. (O'Connor et al., 2002)

His method of thinking is well summarized as:

Habitu ngliger les dtails et ne regarder que les cimes, il passait de l'une l'autre avec une promptitude surprenante et les faits qu'il dcouvrait se groupant d'eux-mmes autour de leur centre taient instantanment et automatiquement classs dans sa mmoire. (He neglected details and jumped from idea to idea, the facts gathered from each idea would then come together and solve the problem.) (Belliver, 1956)



  • Oscar II, King of Sweden's mathematical competition (1887)
  • American Philosophical Society 1899
  • Gold Medal of the Royal Astronomical Society of London (1900)
  • Matteucci Medal 1905
  • French Academy of Sciences 1906
  • Acadmie Franaise 1909
  • Bruce Medal (1911)

Named after him

  • Poincar Prize (Mathematical Physics International Prize)
  • Annales Henri Poincar (Scientific Journal)
  • Poincar Seminar (nicknamed "Bourbaphy")
  • Poincar crater (on the Moon)
  • Asteroid 2021 Poincar


Poincar's major contribution to algebraic topology was Analysis situs (1895), which was the first real systematic look at topology.

He published two major works that placed celestial mechanics on a rigorous mathematical basis:

  • New Methods of Celestial Mechanics ISBN 1563961172 (3 vols., 1892-99; Eng. trans., 1967)
  • Lessons of Celestial Mechanics. (1905-10).

In popular writings he helped establish the fundamental popular definitions and perceptions of science by these writings:

  • Science and Hypothesis, 1901. (complete text online)
  • The Value of Science, 1904. (For more, see the French version.)
  • Science and Method, 1908.
  • Dernires penses (Eng., "Last Thoughts"); Edition Ernest Flammarion, Paris, 1913.


Poincar had the opposite philosophical views of Bertrand Russell and Gottlob Frege, who believed that mathematics were a branch of logic. Poincar strongly disagreed, claiming that intuition was the life of mathematics. Poincar gives an interesting point of view in his book Science and Hypothesis:

For a superficial observer, scientific truth is beyond the possibility of doubt; the logic of science is infallible, and if the scientists are sometimes mistaken, this is only from their mistaking its rule.

Poincar believed that arithmetic is a synthetic science. He argued that Peano's axioms cannot be proven non-circularly with the principle of induction (Murzi, 1998), therefore concluding that arithmetic is a priori synthetic and not analytic. Poincar then went on to say that mathematics cannot be deduced from logic since it is not analytic. His views were the same as those of Kant (Kolak, 2001). However Poincar did not share Kantian views in all branches of philosophy and mathematics. For example, in geometry, Poincar believed that the structure of non-Euclidean space can be known analytically.

See also

  • Poincar–Bendixson theorem
  • Poincar–Birkhoff–Witt theorem
  • Poincar half-plane model
  • Poincar symmetry
  • Poincar–Hopf theorem
  • Poincar metric
  • Poincar duality
  • Poincar group
  • Poincar map
  • History of special relativity
  • Relativity priority disputes


1 H. E. Ives (1952) wrote that Einstein's derivation was a tautology due to Einstein's use of approximations, and credited Planck (1907) with the first correct derivation of E = mc2 in Einstein's meaning. In response J. Riseman and I. G. Young (1953) defended Einstein's derivation and physical insight, and Ives (1953) replied.
2Lorentz (1904) had written x^prime = kell x^{primeprime}, t^{prime} = ell t/k - kell wx^{primeprime}/c^2, k^2 = c^2/left(c^2-w^2right). Later in the paper he deduced that ell = 1. Lorentz's x^{primeprime} was, in Poincar's notation, equal to xwt. Eliminating x^{primeprime} and putting varepsilon = -w/c yields the Lorentz transformations as Poincar wrote them.


This article incorporates material from Jules Henri Poincar on PlanetMath, which is licensed under the GFDL.

  1. ^ [1] Poincar pronunciation example at
  2. ^ The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy Jules Henri Poincar article by Mauro Murzi - accessed Nov 2006.
  • Bell, Eric Temple, 1986. Men of Mathematics (reissue edition). Touchstone Books. ISBN 0671628186.
  • Belliver, Andr, 1956. Henri Poincar ou la vocation souveraine. Paris: Gallimard.
  • Boyer, B. Carl, 1968. A History of Mathematics: Henri Poincar, John Wiley & Sons.
  • Olivier Darrigol (2004): "The Mystery of the Einstein-Poincar Connection". Isis: Vol.95, Issue 4; pg. 614, 14 pgs
  • Ewald, William B., ed., 1996. From Kant to Hilbert: A Source Book in the Foundations of Mathematics, 2 vols. Oxford Uni. Press. Contains among others:
  • Grattan-Guinness, Ivor, 2000. The Search for Mathematical Roots 1870-1940. Princeton Uni. Press.
  • Gray, Jeremy, 1986. Linear differential equations and group theory from Riemann to Poincar, Birkhauser
  • Kolak, Daniel, 2001. Lovers of Wisdom, 2nd ed. Wadsworth.
  • Murzi, 1998. "Henri Poincar".
  • O'Connor, J. John, and Robertson, F. Edmund, 2002, "Jules Henri Poincar". University of St. Andrews, Scotland.
  • Peterson, Ivars, 1995. Newton's Clock: Chaos in the Solar System (reissue edition). W H Freeman & Co. ISBN 0716727242.
  • Poincar, Henri. 1894. "On the nature of mathematical reasoning," 972-81.
  • ________. 1898. "On the foundations of geometry," 982-1011.
  • ________. 1900. "Intuition and Logic in mathematics," 1012-20.
  • ________. 1905-06. "Mathematics and Logic, I-III," 1021-70.
  • ________. 1910. "On transfinite numbers," 1071-74.
  • Sageret, Jules, 1911. Henri Poincar. Paris: Mercure de France.
  • Toulouse, E.,1910. Henri Poincar. - (Source biography in French)

References to work on relativity

  • Einstein, A. (1905) "Zur Elektrodynamik Bewegter Krper", Annalen der Physik, 17, 891. English translation
  • Einstein, A. (1915) "Erklrung der Periheldrehung des Merkur aus der allgemainen Relativittstheorie", Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 799-801
  • Einstein, A. (1916) "Die Grundlage der allgemeinen Relativittstheorie", Annalen der Physik, 49
  • Giannetto, Enrico (1998) "The Rise of Special Relativity: Henri Poincar's Works Before Einstein", Atti del XVIII congresso di storia della fisica e dell'astronomia
  • Galison, Peter Louis (2003) Einstein's Clocks, Poincar's Maps: Empires of Time. New York: W.W. Norton. ISBN 0393020010
  • Hasenhrl, F. (1907) Wien Sitz. CXVI 2a, p.1391
  • Ives, H. E. (1952) "Derivation of the Mass-Energy Relationship", J. Optical Society America, 42, pp. 540-543.
  • Ives, H. E. (1953) "Note on 'Mass-Energy Relationship'", J. Optical Society America, 43, 619.
  • Keswani, G. H. (1965-6) "Origin and Concept of Relativity, Parts I, II, III", Brit. J. Phil. Sci., v15-17.
  • Kragh, Helge. (1999) Quantum Generations: A History of Physics in the Twentieth Century. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
  • Langevin, P. (1905) "Sur l'origine des radiations et l'inertie lectromagntique", Journal de Physique Thorique et Applique, 4, pp.165-183.
  • Langevin, P. (1914) "Le Physicien" in Henri Poincar Librairie (Felix Alcan 1914) pp. 115-202.
  • Lewis, G. N. (1908) Philosophical Magazine, XVI, 705
  • Logunov, A, (2005) Book "Henri Poincar and Relativity Theory", Nauka, Moscow, ISBN 5-02-033964-4
  • Lorentz, H. A. (1899) "Simplified Theory of Electrical and Optical Phenomena in Moving Systems", Proc. Acad. Science Amsterdam, I, 427-43.
  • Lorentz, H. A. (1904) "Electromagnetic Phenomena in a System Moving with Any Velocity Less Than That of Light", Proc. Acad. Science Amsterdam, IV, 669-78.
  • Lorentz, H. A. (1911) Amsterdam Versl. XX, 87
  • Lorentz, H.A. (1921) 1914 manuscripts "Deux memoires de Henri Poincar," Acta Mathematica 38, p.293.
  • Macrossan, M. N. (1986) "A Note on Relativity Before Einstein", Brit. J. Phil. Sci., 37, pp.232-34.
  • Planck, M. (1907) Berlin Sitz., 542
  • Planck, M. (1908) Verh. d. Deutsch. Phys. Ges. X, p218, and Phys. ZS, IX, 828
  • Poincar, H. (1897) "The Relativity of Space", article in English translation
  • Poincar, H. (1898) "La mesure du Temps", reprinted in "La valeur de la science", Ernest Flammarion, Paris.
  • Poincar, H. (1900) "La Theorie de Lorentz et la Principe de Reaction", Archives Neerlandaises, V, 252-78.
  • Poincar, H. (1902) "La valeur de la Science"
  • Poincar, H. (1904) "L'tat actuel et l'avenir de la physique mathmatique", Bulletin des sciences mathmatiques 28(1904), 302-324 (Congress of Arts and Science, St. Louis, September 24, 1904)
  • Poincar, H. (1905) "Sur la dynamique de l'electron", Comptes Rendues, 140, 1504-8.
  • Poincar, H. (1906) "Sur la dynamique de l'electron", Rendiconti del Circolo matematico di Palermo, t.21, 129-176.
  • Poincar, H. (1913) Mathematics and Science: Last Essays, Dover 1963 (translated from Dernires Penses posthumously published by Ernest Flammarion, 1913)
  • Riseman, J. and I. G. Young (1953) "Mass-Energy Relationship", J. Optical Society America, 43, 618.
  • Whittaker, E. T (1953) A History of the Theories of Aether and Electricity: Vol 2 The Modern Theories 1900-1926. Chapter II: The Relativity Theory of Poincar and Lorentz, Nelson, London.

External links

Wikiquote has a collection of quotations related to:
Henri Poincar
  • Works by Henri Poincar at Project Gutenberg
  • Henri Poincar at the Mathematics Genealogy Project
  • O'Connor, John J., and Edmund F. Robertson. "Henri Poincar". MacTutor History of Mathematics archive.
  • Jules Henri Poincar
  • Science and Hypothesis (complete text online - in English)
  • A review of Poincar's life and mathematical achievements - from the University of Tennessee at Martin, USA.
  • A timeline of Poincar's life University of Nancy (in French).
  • Bruce Medal page
  • Henri Poincar, His Conjecture, Copacabana and Higher Dimensions
  • In Our Time -- discussion of the Poincar conjecture, hosted by Melvynn Bragg
Sully Prudhomme
Alfred Capus

This article might use material from a Wikipedia article, which is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0.

Sponsored Links

La Science Et L'hypothèse

By Henri Poincaré
Science Et Technologie

La Science Et L'hypothèse
Details Report
Share this Book!

Mathematics And Science , Last Essays

Mathematics And Science Last Essays

message of the week Message of The Week

Bookyards Youtube channel is now active. The link to our Youtube page is here.

If you have a website or blog and you want to link to Bookyards. You can use/get our embed code at the following link.

Follow us on Twitter and Facebook.

Bookyards Facebook, Tumblr, Blog, and Twitter sites are now active. For updates, free ebooks, and for commentary on current news and events on all things books, please go to the following:

Bookyards at Facebook

Bookyards at Twitter

Bookyards at Pinterest

Bookyards atTumblr

Bookyards blog

message of the daySponsored Links