Author

Pierre De Marivaux

Pierre De Marivaux books and biography

Sponsored Links


Le Jeu De L'amour Et Du Hasard


By Pierre De Marivaux
Theatre Et Jeu

Download Details Report

Share this Book!
										   

Pierre de Marivaux

 The image “http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/98/Marivaux.jpg/180px-Marivaux.jpg” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.

French literature
By category
French literary history

Medieval
16th century - 17th century
18th century -19th century
20th century - Contemporary

French Writers

Chronological list
Writers by category
Novelists - Playwrights
Poets - Essayists
Short story writers

France Portal
Literature Portal
This box: view  talk  edit

Pierre Carlet de Chamblain de Marivaux (commonly known as Marivaux) (February 4, 1688 - February 12, 1763), French novelist and dramatist, was born at Paris.

He is considered the most important French playwright of the 18th century, writing numerous comedies for La Comédie-Française and La Comédie Italienne of Paris. His most important works are Le Jeu de l'Amour et du Hasard and Les Fausses Confidences. He also published a number of essays and two important but unfinished novels, La Vie de Marianne and Le Paysan parvenu.

His father was a financier of Norman extraction whose real name was Carlet, but who assumed the surname of Chamblain, and then superadded that of Marivaux. M. Carlet de Marivaux was a man of good reputation, and he received the appointment of director of the mint at Riom in Auvergne, where and at Limôges the young Pierre was brought up. It is said that he developed literary tastes early, and wrote his first play, the Père prudent et equitable, when he was only eighteen; it was not, however, published till 1712, when he was twenty-four.

His chief attention in those early days was paid to novel writing, not the drama. In the three years from 1713 to 1715 he produced three novels--Effets surprenants de la sympathie; La Voiture embourbée, and a book which had three titles--Pharsamon, Les Folies romanesques, and Le Don Quichotte moderne. All these books were in a curious strain, not in the least resembling the pieces which long afterwards were to make his reputation, but following partly, the Spanish romances and partly the heroic novels of the preceding century, with a certain intermixture of the marvellous.

Then Marivaux's literary ardour took a new phase. He fell under the influence of Antoine Hondar to serve the cause of that ingenious paradoxer by travestying Homer, an ignoble task, which he followed up (perhaps, for it is not certain) by performing the same office in regard to Fénelon. His friendship for La Motte, however, introduced him to the Mercure, the chief newspaper of France, where in 1717 he produced various articles of The Spectator kind, which were distinguished by much keenness of observation and not a little literary skill. It was at this time that the peculiar style called Marivaudage first made its appearance in him. The word marivaudage now signifies the flirtatious bantering tone characteristic of Marivaux's dialogues.

The year 1720 and those immediately following were very important ones for Marivaux; not only did he produce a comedy, now lost except in small part, entitled L'Amour et la vérité, and another and far better one entitled Arlequin poli par l'amour, but he wrote a tragedy, Annibal (printed 1737), which was unsuccessful. Meanwhile his wordly affairs underwent a sudden revolution. His father had left him a comfortable subsistence, but he was persuaded by friends to risk it in the Mississippi scheme, and after vastly increasing it for a time lost all that he had.

His prosperity had enabled him, to marry (perhaps in 1721) a certain Mlle Martin, of whom much good is said, and to whom he was deeply attached, but who died very shortly. His pen now became almost his sole resource. He had a connection with both the fashionable theatres, for his Annibal had been played at the Comédie Française and his Arlequin poli at the Comédie Italienne, where at the time a company who were extremely popular, despite their imperfect command of French, were established. He endeavoured too to turn his newspaper practice in the Mercure de France to more account by starting a weekly Spectateur Français (1722-1723), to which he was the sole contributor. But his habits were the reverse of methodical; the paper appeared at the most irregular intervals; and, though it contained some excellent work, its irregularity killed it. For nearly twenty years the theatre, and especially the Italian theatre, was Marivaux's chief support, for his pieces, though they were not ill received by the actors at the Francais, were rarely successful there.

The best of a very large number of plays (Marivaux's theatre numbers between thirty and forty items) were the Surprise de l'amour (1722), the Triomphe de Plutus (1728), the Jeu de l'amour et du hasard (1730), Les Fausses confidences (1737), all produced at the Italian theatre, and Le Legs (1736), produced at the French. Meanwhile he had at intervals returned to both his other lines of composition. A periodical publication called L'Indigent philosophe appeared in 1727, and another called Le Cabinet du philosophe in 1734, but the same causes which had proved fatal to the Spectateur prevented these later efforts from succeeding.

In 1731 Marivaux published the first two parts of his best and greatest work, Marianne, a novel of a new and remarkable kind. The eleven parts appeared in batches at intervals during a period of exactly the same number of years, and after all it was left unfinished. In 1735 another novel, Le Paysan parvenu, was begun, but this also was left unfinished. He was elected a member of the Académie française in 1742. He survived for more than twenty years, and was not idle, again contributing occasionally to the Mercure, writing plays, reflections (which were seldom of much worth), and so forth. He died on the 12th February 1763, aged seventy-five years.

The personal character of Marivaux was curious and somewhat contradictory, though not without analogies, one of the closest of which is to be found in Goldsmith. He was, however, unlike Goldsmith, at least as brilliant in conversation as with the pen. He was extremely good-natured, but fond of saying very severe things, unhesitating in his acceptance of favours (he drew a regular annuity from Helvétius), but exceedingly touchy if he thought himself in any way slighted. He was, though a great cultivator of sensibility, on the whole decent and moral in his writings, and was unsparing in his criticism of the rising Philosophes. This last circumstance, and perhaps jealousy as well, made him a dangerous enemy in Voltaire, who lost but few opportunities of speaking disparagingly of him. He had good friends, not merely in the rich, generous and amiable Helvétius, but in Mme de Tencin, in Fontenelle and even in Madame de Pompadour, who gave him, it is said, a considerable pension, (of which he was ignorant). His extreme sensitiveness is shown by many stories. He had one daughter, who took the veil, the duke of Orleans, the regents successor, furnishing her with her dowry.

The so-called Marivaudage is the main point of importance about Marivaux's literary work, though the best of the comedies have great merits, and Marianne is an extremely important step in the legitimate development of the French novel-legitimate, that is, in opposition to the brilliant but episodic productions of Le Sage. Its connection, and that of Le Paysan parvenu, with the work not only of Richardson but of Fielding is also an interesting though a difficult subject. The subject matter of Marivaux's peculiar style has been generally and with tolerable exactness described as the metaphysic of love-making. His characters, in a happy phrase of Claude Prosper Jolyot Crébillon's, not only tell each other and the reader everything they have thought, but everything that they would like to persuade themselves that they have thought.

The style chosen for this is justly regarded as derived mainly from Fontenelle, and through him from the Précieuses, though there are traces of it even in La Bruyère. It abuses metaphor somewhat, and delights to turn off a metaphor itself in some unexpected and bizarre fashion. Now it is a familiar phrase which is used where dignified language would be expected; now the reverse. In the criticism of Crébillon's already quoted occurs another happy description of Marivaux's style as being an introduction to each other of words which have never made acquaintance, and which think that they will not get on together, a phrase as happy in its imitation as in its satire of the style itself. This kind of writing, of course, recurs at several periods of literature, and did so remarkably at the end of the 19th century in more countries than one. Yet this fantastic embroidery of language has a certain charm, and suits perhaps better than any other style the somewhat unreal gallantry and sensibility which it describes and exhibits. The author possessed, moreover, both thought and observation, besides considerable command of pathos.

The best and most complete edition of Marivaux is that of 1781 in 12 vols. reprinted with additions 1825-1830. The plays had been published during the author's lifetime in 1740 and 1748. There are more recent editions by Paul de Saint Heylli Victor (1863), by G d'Heylli (1876) and by E Fournier (1878), while issues of selections and separate plays and novels are numerous. Of works concerning him J Fleury's Marivaux et le Marivaudage (Paris, 1881), G Larroumet's Marivaux, sa vie et ses œuvres (1882; new ed, 1894), the standard work on the subject, and G Deschamps's Marivaux (1897), in the Grands écrivains français, are the most important. Separate articles on him will be found in the collected essays of the chief modern French critics from Sainte-Beuve onwards.

His play Le Triomphe de l'Amour was filmed in English in 2001 as The Triumph of Love, starring Mira Sorvino, Ben Kingsley, and Fiona Shaw. It is, so far, the only one of Marivaux's plays to ever be filmed in English (there have been many French film and television adaptations of his plays). The film received modestly favorable reviews, but was not a box office success.

References

  • This article incorporates text from the Encyclopædia Britannica Eleventh Edition, a publication now in the public domain.
Wikisource
Wikisource has original text related to this article:
Marivaux


This article might use material from a Wikipedia article, which is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0.



Convert any Books to Kobo

* Notice to all users: You can export our search engine to your blog, website, facebook or my space.

message of the week Message of The Week

Bookyards Facebook, Tumblr, Blog, and Twitter sites are now active. For updates, free ebooks, and for commentary on current news and events on all things books, please go to the following:

Bookyards at Facebook

Bookyards at Twitter

Bookyards at Pinterest

Bookyards at Tumblr

Bookyards blog


message of the daySponsored Links